Living Oprah
Hey Elizabeth, When Are You Going to Stop Posting Links About People Hating On Hillary Clinton Because She’s a Woman?
Two Awesomely Hilarious Links
Another Freaking Links Post…with Videos!
Okay, I promise I’m not going to start doing this all the time, but I have to post a few more links.
I don’t generally watch news on television, so I was pretty much unaware of Chris Matthews until everyone started printing and reprinting his outrageous statements about Clinton, which seriously, I can’t believe he’s retained his employment, and MSNBC should be ashamed. But more generally, here’s what I don’t get: if I were a man who did not want a woman to be president (or even just not this particular woman), I would tiptoe around saying anything even remotely approaching misogyny, because I would not want to remind the female voters in America right at this crucial moment that they are still living in a very sexist country. What is with people? Don’t they get that woman-bashing right now will certainly mobilize women to vote for a woman? Or are they just so gosh-darn furious at the very notion of a woman running for our country’s highest office that not even self-interest can shut them up? Well, I guess any variety of bigotry is a product of unintelligence in the first place, so I ought not to be surprised. (In case you’ve only witnessed Matthews’ most recent “tough and provocative”* criticism of Clinton, and the resultant apology, check out his history of ridiculous comments to a wide variety of female guests on his show.)
*(his words)
–
And on a far stupider topic, I am a huge fan of each new exposure of Scientology for the disgusting load that it is. Not only is it a bullshit cult, but its teachings are racist and hateful (here are some fantastic quotes from the founder on the subject of race). It is not just harmless craziness. So, yay to Gawker for hosting the Tom Cruise video.
–
So, I guess this links post could be summed up as “really moronic things I ought to just ignore, but am so continually needled by that I just can’t quite leave them alone.”
No One Would Vote For Achola Obama
Gloria Steinem in the Times: “. . . what worries me is that he is seen as unifying by his race while she is seen as divisive by her sex.”
—
Update: I’m going to post more links about Clinton here, because, even though it’s completely outside the scope of this blog, this is a hot topic for several of my friends and relatives, and I know they’ll be interested. Let me just say, before I get into this, that I myself am not an unadulterated Clinton supporter. I don’t dislike her, though – certainly not with the vehemence of so many Democrats. I’ve also been an Obama fan ever since his 2004 Senate run. I was thrilled he won in Iowa and inspired by his awesome speech. I feel very conflicted about the primaries this year, and I know a few of you do, too; thus, all the linkage:
The following Slate post kind of annoys me, because it attributes Clinton’s New Hampshire win to a Hallmark-y outpouring of sympathy, including all the usual explanations that make me want to punch people – women voted for her because she cried, or because they felt sorry for her, etc. I do, however, love this description of the candidates:
And here’s a brief response to Steinem’s column that gives women a little more credit for having substantive reasons to back one candidate or the other:
Going back to Steinem’s column, the following quote really stood out to me:
What worries me is that some women, perhaps especially younger ones, hope to deny or escape the sexual caste system; thus Iowa women over 50 and 60, who disproportionately supported Senator Clinton, proved once again that women are the one group that grows more radical with age.
I have noticed this sort of attitude in other young women (and in myself) for years, and it’s really been highlighted with Clinton’s candidacy. So many times, I will find myself reluctant to even mention gender, because it makes me feel silly. Like, ‘oh, come on, that? Haven’t we all gotten past that yet?’ I think women my age believe that, if they just refuse to acknowledge the ways in which sexual inequality still exists, it won’t affect their lives and their choices. But as each generation ages, and attempts to accomplish bigger and more important things in their lives and in the world, they realize that sexism is not anywhere near dead yet, and feminism must remain part of the dialogue. And on that note, here’s yet another Slate post.
And another one attempting to explain New Hampshire. As I’ve said, I think that the Lazio effect is an inadequate explanation, and not merely because it is insulting (although Clinton herself says she thinks it contributed). One need only be a bit down on one’s luck in New York City for a few days to realize just how very much people – men and women alike – do not love a loser. America has no pity: if you fall down, the majority of people will just start a-kicking. And despite the stereotypes, women are usually no less predatory in this respect (remember seventh grade?). I think the fourth explanation offered is the most likely. Here’s Josh Marshall’s take.
One thing is certain: the Obama v. Clinton issue is a big conundrum for a lot of women. Several interesting reader comments on Talking Points Memo: here, here, here, and here.
Dates Arranged by the NY Post
My friend Chris was recently set up on a date by the New York Post’s Meet Market dating section. It was one of those deals where the paper pays for the date, and then each dater writes in and says what they thought of the whole evening. At any rate, Chris wrote a short play inspired by this event, and it’s hilarious, so thought I’d share it with you:
The Modern Day Disconnect Between the Sexes: A Short 10 Minute Play
Greenpoint
A week ago, Time Out New York’s cover story was on my neighborhood, Greenpoint, Brooklyn. It said Greenpoint was the next it neighborhood.
Link: Women in Saudi Arabia
I experienced a lot of the feelings this reporter describes having when I was traveling Asia. Although I didn’t feel like any of the Southeast Asian cultures were misogynist, women were certainly viewed as a sort of different, lesser species, and had very limited mobility – they were treated like children. And while I think feminism still has a long way to go here in the States, still, if I had to be born female, I sure as hell am glad I was born here.
Why isn’t comedy taken seriously?
One man’s explanation. (Incidentally, if you’ve never read Money, I highly recommend it.)
I’m Not the Only One Who Hates Green Tea
Slate columnists are on a roll lately (see also related articles at the end). Anytime you think merely ingesting a substance says something about your virtue as a person, you’ve likely fallen victim to a marketing campaign. In fact, I’m suspicious of the whole ‘moral groceries’ movement in general. I don’t doubt there are some benefits; I’m just not sure that spending large amounts on attractively packaged, peer-approved, designer groceries is helping impoverished nations, the environment and our own bodies and souls quite as much as it is helping Whole Foods, Amy, Annie, et al. Avoiding pesticides is all well and good, but it’s not the key to a Utopian society. You can’t save the world just by stuffing your face.
Now, having preached, let me redeem myself slightly by admitting that my own fridge is currently stocked with these products, and that this entire rant was likely triggered by my wandering into the Union Square Whole Foods yesterday and having the most terrifying experience of my life. I’m still recovering. In my opinion, one of the chief advantages to living in this country in this century is that we do not typically have to club each other to death for food. Apparently, fashionable New Yorkers don’t know this. I was buffeted, herded and knocked from one end of the store to the other, up the escalators and down, around the olive bar and into the cheese display. I could sort of glimpse vague food shapes above the massing swell of browsing heads, but every time I got close, I was promptly shoved out again. I can understand having to work so hard to get up to a bar and obtain a martini, but I’ll be damned if scoring soy milk from a dairy case is worth possible death and dismemberment. At one point, my splinted hand (which I’d mostly been clutching guardedly to my chest as if it were an infant) accidentally slipped into a lady’s shopping bag and lodged there. I tried like mad to extract it, but it only became more entangled. ‘Sorry, sorry,’ I kept repeating, as she, a real pro, went on with her shopping, dragging me up and down the aisle and glaring at me the while.
When I finally extricated myself from her bag, I was more than ready to flee. Oh, for a $.69 Patio burrito from a corner minimart! Sadly, the exits were through the check-out lines, which were so long, they wound around an entire floor. Again, I’d think a major advantage to living in a thriving capitalist country would be never having to queue all day for rations, but then, I suppose if it’s your choice and you have an ipod to listen to while you wait, it’s not so bad. At any rate, I finally fought my way out through the entrance, which was about as easy as swimming up a waterfall, and emerged, bloody and battered, in Union Square, where I promptly secured a hot dog from a street vendor.
–
On another topic altogether, the Times slams this year’s Humana Festival.I am in favor of new play festivals in general (and the Humana Festival in particular), and not having seen any of the plays reviewed here, I can’t say whether I agree with the review, but I do agree with this:
Marc Masterson, artistic director of the Actors Theater of Louisville, the festival’s host for three decades, favors plays that engage with contemporary culture and politics. That’s admirable, but it can result in work that telegraphs its importance in capital letters (a failing epitomized by Craig Wright’s “Unseen”), prizes preachment over drama (as in that secret history of Barbie) or disguises a hollow core with grabby imagery (as did “Dark Play”).
I’m tired of seeing these badly written issue plays everywhere, and the reason young playwrights keep churning them out is because that’s what the folks with the money and the venues prefer that everyone submit.
Seriously, more links? I do apologize, but it’s just so easy and, as I think I’ve mentioned a couple of hundred times, my hand is hurt. I promise I will post something original before I post any more links.
Not (Particularly) Funny
This post is not strictly within the scope of this blog, but I happened to read several articles today that really did a great job of articulating various gripes I’ve been nursing lately, such as:
“the ‘indie-rockization’ of the comedy audience”
Why the hell does everyone want to read non-fiction memoirs anyway?
So…is deconstruction bullshit, or not?
(Linked to the last two from The Morning News.)
And last, but not least:
Oh, my blood pressure went down just watching this. This made me feel all calm and warm inside.
(Linked to from East Village Idiot.)
Clearly, I’ve got oodles of time on my hands these days, what with the injury and all. The only hard and fast appointments I have are with various television programs (next: Arrested Development rerun at 2:30 p.m.). Shut up. It’s raining out.
Sometimes the World Seems a Lot More Fixable…
I’m Not the Only One Who Hates Yoga
NYC Apartment Hunting
Having recently spent a freezing long-weekend in January apartment hunting in NYC, I so appreciate the following:
http://www.mcsweeneys.net/2007/3/16sweeney.html
Really, this is so accurate, it barely qualifies as satire.