Archive for ‘New York City’

July 23, 2008

Fury Thrives In a Crowd

This in response to an interesting story about someone who stood up to a line jumper:

Norms are not easy to enforce when then target of the enforcement is insouciant or otherwise resistant to the threat of being shamed or embarrassed. Lance’s experience (suddenly feeling like he’s the jerk, anger channeling into embarrassment, etc) is likely very common.

This strong, unpleasant emotional reaction could be thought of as part of the cost of enforcing a general norm when you personally don’t have much to gain from doing it, and thus a reason to pass it by. But there seems to be more to it than that, as the emotional upset also pushes the interaction forward.

Living in NYC, I find myself in an environment where social etiquette is far more crucial to everybody’s happiness than anywhere else I’ve ever lived.  Everyone here is so continuously amongst each other, and every good and service so sought after by throngs of people, that there’s no putting social transgressions aside, knowing that you’ll go home and forget about it.  Home is nothing but a small eye in the middle of a continual hurricane, and there is never a moment of silence and space in which to decompress from the constant pushing and shoving of everybody else.

It’s pretty unlivable, especially for somebody with my temperament, but it will teach you to be assertive.  Six years ago, I’d never have dreamed of calling a stranger out for anything.  Now, if someone jumps me in line, I can’t keep from saying, ‘Excuse me.  I was here.’   Or, on grumpier days, ‘We-ell, go right on ahead, then!’

People always get embarrassed and pretend they didn’t see me there, but they saw me.  They just thought I wouldn’t say anything if they bowled right over me.  Which is another thing about NYC – not only is it not ok to let people jump you, it’s also not ok to let them get away with thinking you’re the sort who’ll suffer a jumping.  It’s a point of pride.

The other day, I was in a very crowded subway train, and there were two young, cute girls in summery dresses right in front of me.  This guy, who was in the center with nothing to hold onto, sort of grabbed or pushed up against one of the girls, and when she glared at him, he smiled in a smug way, and said, ‘Can’t help it.’  Referring to the crowded train and lack of hand-holds.

‘Oh, you can’t help it?’  cried the girl (and you can always just see it in someone’s face when they’ve had it – I really pay attention at these times, because it’s bound to be awesome).  ‘You can’t help it?  Well, I can’t help this:  I’m gonna slap the shit outta you!   Think you can just grab me – I will slap that smile right off your face.  Look at him, some smarmy little asshole, oh, he’s smarmy, too, look at him, think he gonna grab me.  I will kill you, fool!’

And on and on she went, giving a very loud and accurate description of all the various ways in which this fellow was not desirable to any woman anywhere, until her friend grabbed her by the shoulders and told her to stop.

I was so thrilled!  It was the best thing I’d seen in weeks.  I managed not to applaud, but couldn’t suppress my ear-to-ear grin, which this guy also saw, as he got more and more trounced in front of this train packed with strangers.  By the time he got off, his head was so far down in his neck, all you could see was his bald spot sticking out of his collar.  It was glorious.

If only every woman eviscerated gross guys like that, we’d have no more issues in the subways.

July 18, 2008

Carrots Finds Housing

Not too long ago, Slate posted an article on the Anne of Green Gables books. I read all the Anne books when I was a kid, but I don’t remember a whole lot about them. I remember the first one (although I do get it mixed up with the movie, Pollyanna. Wasn’t there also a movie version of Anne? Which one was the one where the girl takes pieces of a chandelier into the room of a bedridden old man? And was there also another movie very similar to Pollyanna that came out around the same time, also possibly with Haley Mills? Was it Rebecca of Sunnybrook Farms? And if not, what was Rebecca of Sunnybrook Farms? And why is the spellchecker telling me that’s not how you spell Rebecca? Its suggestions for replacements look far weirder. I am SO CONFUSED).

Anyway, the other main thing that I remember from the books is the episode in one of the later ones when Anne is wandering around her college town looking for housing, and she stumbles across this darling, little Victorian gingerbread house in a beautiful area, and she goes up, knocks on the door, utterly charms the two old maids who live there, and some deal is promptly worked out whereby Anne and her roommate can live in this story-book house (which is full furnished and has matching porcelain dogs on either side of the fireplace, which I guess is a…plus?) for little money, and at great satisfaction to everyone involved.

Even as a child, this made an impression on me. “That must be how one finds apartments!” I thought. And you know what’s nuts? That is how I’ve found most of my apartments! I usually go to a nice area, wander around, find a shady street, look for a sign advertising a studio in my price range and buzz the super. Generally, it only takes an afternoon. Until I moved to this freaking city. That’s not how it works here.

I’ve been spending a good bit of time lately wandering around Brooklyn Heights. It’s really nice there, and they have the Promenade, and it’s one of the least crowded areas in New York that I’ve found. And I thought the other day, as I walked through its freaking gorgeous streets – those kind of streets where the buildings all have big sweeping red brick stairs that give broadly onto the sidewalks, and all the trees are huge and green and meet in the middle of the street, and there seems to always be a gentle wind funneling billows of snow-white petals down the blocks, and you feel like you ought to put your arms out to the side and spin, until you realize everyone who lives there is watching to make sure you’re leaving soon – I thought to myself that the future solution to artists and colorful eccentrics being priced out of NYC (a subject that everyone says they’re oh so upset about, although I doubt they’d put their money where their mouths are) is for a family living in one of those homes to provide a room to somebody they find unobjectionable and delightful for a very reasonable rent.

I would be a very good tenant for a nice family. I’m quiet, and clean, and I never have anyone over. The only thing is, I wouldn’t want to get involved on any level with the family. They would have to be willing to maintain a certain degree of impersonal detachment that most people really can’t maintain over a long period. And they’d absolutely have to leave me entirely alone at all times, and not make comments about my peculiar eating habits. And more than that, I have absolutely no idea what the advantage of the arrangement would be to them. They surely wouldn’t need the small rent I would pay. While I could pitch in with housework, and occasionally baby-, pet- and/or house-sit, people that rich could easily hire somebody to do that.

I need to figure out something I can bring to the table.

July 14, 2008

All Alone In Public Spaces

I am excited beyond belief to share with all of you, dear readers, a grand realization I had this past weekend. This was the sort of ‘aha!’ lightbulb moment after which the world is never the same again, but is a little wider, a little shinier, a little more bearable.

I realized that the best way not to be surrounded by obnoxious, loud people in public spaces in New York is to sit near a bunch of quiet people to begin with, rather than go sit off by yourself somewhere.

Here’s how I came to that realization: I bought a sandwich and went to consume it in a pretty, park-like area, and, as usual, went straight for a bench in the most deserted stretch of park. I was halfway through my sandwich when a couple of giggling teenagers came and sat right on top of me, despite the general emptiness of the area, and began to converse, in loud and squealing terms, about their burgeoning sex lives.

My entire life I have whined about how strangers seem to seek me out. I find the close proximity of other people repellent on a visceral level that most people do not feel for their fellow humans, which I realize is a personal shortcoming, but which I cannot help, because it is a kneejerk, gut-level reaction, cultivated in early childhood and continually reinforced by the fact that other people really do consistently suck out loud in every conceivable fashion. And yet, despite my extreme misanthropy, people gravitate towards me like metal filings. I need only install myself in a totally deserted area to make that area the most coveted spot in town. No matter where I am standing – even if it’s next to the only Port-a-Pot in a malarial swamp – five seconds after I have begun standing there, at least ten people will urgently need to stand right where I’m standing, usually with their dogs and babies and cameras and stereos and B.O. and inappropriately loud domestic fights and all.

I’d always assumed that this was a sort of karmic punishment for my disliking other humans’ close proximity so much – a sort of ‘who the hell do you think you are’ rebuke from the universe. Except that I don’t really believe in any sort of large-scale cosmic justice, so I kept looking for other reasons.

Anyway, back to this weekend, these teenagers were yapping on about their various forays into the wide world of sex, both homo- and hetero-style, and how they sometimes did so with hesitancy and sometimes with great enthusiasm, depending upon the other person involved, the amount of various intoxicants in their systems, and the suitability and romance of the atmosphere. And they were doing that thing where they were actually looking right at me and projecting in my direction while they ostensibly talked to each other. I provided an audience for them, which made the whole thing more interesting to them, I suppose. At some point, something so very ridiculous was lobbed so obviously in my direction that I audibly sighed, rolled my eyes, got up and packed up my sandwich and moved on.

I began looking for another deserted stretch of park, when suddenly, I had the inspiration to sit instead right smack between two older couples who were each murmuring quietly to each other while glaring at everyone passing by.

It was the best decision I ever made! I enjoyed my sandwich in peace and solitude, buffered on both sides by a cranky, old couple that didn’t want to look at me, or for me to overhear word one of their conversations. And it was at this point that I realized why people had always been coming to sit by me: they had been doing it on purpose precisely because I was quietly reading a book! They knew that they would be able to dominate the space, and that my presence would ensure against any louder people coming to sit next to them.

In New York, you never sit in an empty area, because no area is empty for very long. Rather, you pick the least offensive strangers, and then you scooch in right on top of them. That way, you have some control over your fate. I put this new theory into practice over the rest of the weekend, and I have to say, my quality of life has improved by leaps and bounds. I feel less angry, less hassled, happier and more well-inclined towards my fellow man. And I’m beginning to think that perhaps New York is somewhat livable after all, if you just learn how to work with it.

Speaking of despicable haters, I have really taken note of the passing of Jesse Helms. I think that the worst possible thing that you can do with your life is live it in such a way that, five seconds after you’re in the ground, people everywhere burst forth with celebrations of your death and denunciations of everything you were. Scores of private assholes are despised posthumously by everyone who knew them, but it seems like, if you are going to be an asshole, at least do yourself the courtesy of limiting your own exposure. Because to be a hated asshole on such a very grand scale as the late Senator Helms seems to me to be far, far worse than spending your entire life in your room doing nothing and seeing no one. I really hope that, whatever I do or don’t do in life, I don’t do such a grandly awful job of it as to be remembered as the world now remembers Jesse Helms.

Of course, if I can’t be confident of the purity of my heart saving me from such a fate, at least I can rely on my lethargy and ineffectiveness.

Related, what does make people so social? Mirror neurons:

Mirror neurons are the only brain cells we know of that seem specialized to code the actions of other people and also our own actions. They are obviously essential brain cells for social interactions. Without them, we would likely be blind to the actions, intentions and emotions of other people. The way mirror neurons likely let us understand others is by providing some kind of inner imitation of the actions of other people, which in turn leads us to “simulate” the intentions and emotions associated with those actions. When I see you smiling, my mirror neurons for smiling fire up, too, initiating a cascade of neural activity that evokes the feeling we typically associate with a smile. I don’t need to make any inference on what you are feeling, I experience immediately and effortlessly (in a milder form, of course) what you are experiencing.

(via 3QD)

Here in America, even in our public parks, everybody thinks it’s their own, personal bench. Blame it on the Renaissance:

This focus on the individual, and its false equation with democracy, began back in the Renaissance. The Renaissance brought us wonderful innovations, such as perspective painting, scientific observation, and the printing press. But each of these innovations defined and celebrated individuality. Perspective painting celebrates the perspective of an individual on a scene. Scientific method showed how the real observations of an individual promote rational thought. The printing press gave individuals the opportunity to read, alone, and cogitate. Individuals formed perspectives, made observations, and formed opinions.

The individual we think of today was actually born in the Renaissance. The Vesuvian Man, Da Vinci’s great drawing of a man in a perfect square and circle-independent and self-sufficient. This is the Renaissance ideal.

It was the birth of this thinking, individuated person that led to the ethos underlying the Enlightenment. Once we understood ourselves as individuals, we understood ourselves as having rights. The Rights of Man. A right to property. The right to personal freedom.

(via 3QD)

Briefly:

Kids make their parents miserable.

Noooooooo!!!!! 99% of my diet is soy!!! It was the one thing that was never bad! That’s it, screw it, I’m going back to living on microwave burritos and beer.

This is good stuff to know.

July 8, 2008

Time Enough At Last

But if you go carrying pictures of Chairman Mao, you ain’t going to make it with anyone anyhow:

We are witnessing a globalized political whitewash job, with artists and assorted collectors, dealers, and sycophants pouring a thick layer of avant-garde double-talk over the infernal decade of suffering, destruction, and death that Mao unleashed on his country in 1966. And as we are also dealing with the house of mirrors that is the art world, I have no doubt that somebody is ready to explain that I am confusing appropriation with approbation or that fascism is just another way of spelling freedom.

(via 3QD)

Better, a roundup of art reflecting desolation, worlds without people and post-apocalyptic cityscapes:

This new ruin romanticism is especially evident in the Flooded London imagery, rendered up by Squint/Opera (the firm behind the visualisations for the 2012 Olympic Stadium, via Archinect – what could be the emotional motivation behind their fascination with rendered ruins?). The imagined ruin has always existed – they have been a staple artistic subject for centuries. Only the focus used to be on abandoned civilizations, the perceived hubris of the ancients. In contrast, the virtual ruination of the modern era is self-imposed schadenfreude, with all the damage and joy turned inwards. It is a feeling made universal by the internet, where planning catastrophes and architectural missteps are all lovingly chronicled and catalogued.

When I Am Legend came out, New York was briefly plastered with posters of Will Smith and his dog, walking briskly down a completely empty city street.  Commuters gazed upon the posters with wistful sighs.

Last night, the boy next door who’s been learning guitar, held a little concert just outside my window.  He went through the entire White Album, and his group of friends was very encouraging of his efforts.  If I woke up tomorrow and found myself the last human on Earth, I think I’d be alright with it.  (And I wear contact lenses, so.)

July 4, 2008

How Many Movies and Hot Dogs Can You Consume Today?

I’m already bored of Wall-E. I haven’t seen it. I haven’t really heard all that much about it. I’ve seen, I think, one preview. I’ve listened to everybody I’ve talked to in the last couple of weeks assert that it’s really very good, and that I ought to see it right away. And I’ve seen headlines of articles and blog posts about it on every site I visit – I haven’t even read the articles; I’ve just seen the headlines.

And I’m already sick of it. This is what happens to me all the time with whatever culture thing everybody goes nuts for. It’s not that I don’t want to see it, or that I wouldn’t like it on its merits. I’m sure it’s great, and I’m sure I’d love it. But I probably won’t see it, just like I never ended up seeing Juno or, well, really any movie, honestly. I think in the last year, I saw The Orphanage and Miss Pettigrew Lives For a Day (both with other people, after all the movies on offer went through the rigorous screening process that is everybody else’s tastes and what they’ve already seen, so you end up left with something random, but by and large unobjectionable like The Orphanage or Miss Pettigrew), and that’s it.

It’s just that, within five minutes of a film being released, it’s freaking everywhere, and I feel like I’ve seen it, not just once, but over and over and over again.

And furthermore, I guess that some people are glad for the next cool thing, but personally (and I know I’m not the only one), I’m always drowning under a cultural backlog of things that I must absolutely see, read, experience, be up on, and whenever someone tells me that I simply must drop everything and see this thing RIGHT NOW, it feels downright rude. I have enough culture to be wading through! I don’t need somebody barging into my little culture-absorber’s library carrel and screaming, “Drop everything! We’re all seeing a movie about a robot RIGHT THIS MINUTE!” What the crap? I’m still working on seeing Juno! Are we done with that already? I still haven’t seen The Godfather. Or Say Anything. Or the first Batman – the one with Christian Bale, not the twelve Batmans before that. And I never saw Brokeback Mountain, either. Not to mention there are oodles of You-Tube videos people simply won’t speak to me until I watch now right now. So, you know what, Wall-E might not get watched right this damn minute, and he’ll just have to wait his turn, won’t he?

I’m feeling stressed just thinking about it. I realize that some people think that films and books and web bits and stand-up comics are things to be enjoyed recreationally, as they come, and need not be amassed like plunder in the various stockpiles of one’s brain. I realize that for some people, word of a new cultural sensation they’d not heard of before is a treat, not a sign of personal failure. But I think these people are of a different species from me entirely.

These are the type of people who say things like, “I’m looking for a good book to read.” A statement which I cannot believe anyone could ever utter in all sincerity. Who are these people?

Here, odd, disinterested space-people: here is my 58-page single-spaced insane book list I’ve been adding to since I was twelve years old, with titles scribbled all up and down the margins and extra Post-It notes covered in chicken scratch stuck on all over. Close your eyes and point to one. You’re welcome.

Meanwhile, I’m off to see Wall-E. I mean, The Dark Knight. I mean, STOP MAKING MUST-SEE MOVIES FOR A LITTLE WHILE, WON’T YOU?

Speaking of glut, the 4th of July is the day for one of America’s greatest annual events: Nathan’s Famous 4th of July International Hot Dog Eating Contest, the competitive eating event of the year. I’ve mentioned my obsession with competitive eating several times on this blog, and all the heavies will be at Nathan’s this year: Kobayashi, Joey Chestnut, and my personal favorite, Sonya ‘The Black Widow’ Thomas. Thomas is a 100-lb., 5’5″ Korean woman who has consistently demonstrated an astounding ability to put away large amounts of food:

She swallowed the egg. Then she swallowed 64 more in six minutes and 40 seconds. She could have eaten more but the organizers ran out of eggs. . . . “Eggs are easy to eat,” Thomas explains. “I could eat 80 or 90.”

(My obsession with all this, however, is not so unreasonable that I would actually go down to Coney Island this morning and experience first-hand the crush of humanity crowding around the Nathan’s Famous stand there.)

Speaking of impressive athletes, click here to marvel at the mind-blowing physique of Dara Torres, 41-year-old swimmer who’s attempting to qualify for the 50-meter freestyle in the Olympics this year. If I were to pick a role-model between the two, I think eating 64 eggs in 6 minutes is a slightly more reachable goal for me than looking like Ms. Torres when I’m 40.

It’s probably a good thing all of my goals are in culture consumption.

June 22, 2008

I’ve Been…Smiling

Summer is the time to reevaluate how my face is coming along. This year’s scrutiny (coming after a full year of life in NYC) brought to light a couple of problems:

1. I need to wear sunscreen every, single day from now until I’m dead; and

2. I need to stop going around with a permanent, furious scowl.

I’m getting mad lines, and one thing I do not want is to be one of these old women (or old men, for that matter – I shouldn’t just say women) whose faces have settled into a permanent expression, directed at everything and everybody, that says nothing so much as, ‘What on Earth! The nerve of you, walking around with your whorish face and your young pants!’ (Or, in the case of old men, ‘Goddamn you, with your stupid face and pants.’)

My fear of ending up hopelessly trapped behind a mask of outraged tragedy, regardless of whatever I’m actually thinking or feeling, is why I’m not as hard on people who get Botox as most of my fellow anti-vanity/age-defying-treatments feminists. People always say it robs you of expression – but so does a permanent bitchface, and the bitchface has the added disadvantage of making other people take an immediate dislike of you. When I get old, I want my wrinkles to be of the ‘Life is hilarious!!! I look like a well-fed pug dog!’ variety. But for that, you have to have an ear-to-ear grin all your life, and I rarely smile, because I hate everything.

All of which is a long explanation for why I decided, upon coming back from vacation this past Sunday, to make a concerted effort to go around with a gentle smile on my face. Other young women do this – the problem is, because they’re only doing a lips-closed slight smile with their faces frozen above the nose, it usually comes off looking like a self-satisfied, judgmental smirk, but at least it keeps the scowl lines at bay.

So, starting Monday, I’ve been walking around smiling everywhere. Which, incidentally, provides an amusing clash of context, because I’m still an angry commuter. I still speedwalk, tailgate, step on people’s heels and cut them off, but now I do all that with a beatific smile on my face, as though my body and my head are unaware of each other’s activities.

And I’ve noticed something – something that I remember from way back in the distant past, something that eventually made me feel so annoyed and hassled that I began to develop the permanent scowl I’m now trying to eradicate…

Smiling makes you approachable. This week, I have given oh, so many directions. I have had to duck a frightening amount of attempted eye contact. And I have even been asked by children to retrieve errant sport balls that had gone into the street. But the climax of all of this occurred on Wednesday.

On Wednesday, I was taking the 6 train downtown, when a girl who was disembarking paused to lean into my face and exclaim, waving her hands and grinning, ‘Are you in loooove???’

‘What?’ I said.

‘You look like you’re in love! You’re just smiling and laughing to yourself, and I thought – there’s something great going on with her!!’

Now, from time to time, I’ve had various unsolicited comments and questions directed at me by strangers. They include: ‘Damn, girl. I ain’t hurtin’ you;’ ‘Are you okay?’;’ ‘Calm down, bitch;’ and ‘Excuuuuse me.’

But never, ever, in my entire life has anybody ever asked me what I was so happy about. I guess there’s some truth to ‘smile and the world smiles with you.’

No matter what you’re really thinking.

me

Is this looooove???

June 20, 2008

The Inexplicably Furious Mannequins of Macy’s

C&H strip

That said, I have to admit, I get kind of excited about the (partially) wooden escalators on the upper floors of Macy’s:

escalator

I bring up Macy’s because I made a pilgrimage there not long ago. Now, Macy’s is the sort of place that I would normally avoid at all costs, but, having gotten my stimulus check and considered it at length, I finally decided to use part of it for a pair of long-coveted Frye boots.

So, I figured I’d go to Macy’s, try on all the boots, and then go home and buy them at off-season sale price on Amazon or ebay.

Once I got to wandering around Macy’s, however, I got distracted from my mission. Because Macy’s decor is really elaborately weird. First of all, I’m pretty sure they’re actually intentionally matching the clothes to the light fixtures:

matchy

Then, there were the mannequins. At first, I mostly noticed the weirdly futuristic spring-themes (it was spring at the time). There were metallic mannequins dancing in the rain:

rain

And lounging with giant gold praying mantises:

mantis

And forming symbiotic relationships with smaller praying mantises:

smaller mantis

But around the time I came across this young lady on her horse:

horse2

. . . I started to notice that all of the mannequins looked…dejected. I mean, here’s this lovely woman astride (or atop) a white horse in the middle of a forest of brightly colored cocktail dresses, with starburst light fixtures framing her head, and she just looks like all the Prozac in the world couldn’t truly get her back in the saddle again.

There were sad mannequins everywhere:

sad

Except the more I looked at them, the more they looked pissed, rather than sad:

pissed

Yeah, actually. They were really pissed. And there were lots of them.

gangbetter

They were pissed off in droves. It began to get a little intimidating. I started to feel they were closing in slowly.

pink

These Pepto-Bismal-boobed ones are so very pissed that you can tell they’re pissed without their even having faces to express it! (Possibly their personal praying-mantis-hair-accessories had turned on them and scratched off all their features.)

And it wasn’t just the nipply anorexics in the junior’s department and the terminators in the misses’ section that were spitting furious – the kids were pissed, too! In fact, they may have been the most pissed of all:

skater

What the hell are you looking at?

I would not want to run into these children late at night.

kids

You’re in our hood now.

These kids freaking hate Macy’s shoppers.

angriestkid

I will cut you.

I listened to Tatum O’Neal there, and beat it. Anyway, Macy’s didn’t end up having any Frye boots (and in case you’re curious, in the end I couldn’t bring myself to pay that much for a pair of boots and ended up getting a pair of Steve Madden ones from Amazon for under $50 – they’re a little too big, but with two pairs of socks, I think they’ll be just the ticket).

shoecarnage

Shoe carnage.

June 16, 2008

I’m Back. It’s Monday. Shoot Me.

Did the world end while I was in the mountains?  I wouldn’t know.  I’m not sure I would much care.  At first glance, I see that Tim Russert died, everything is still expensive, and we’re all supposed to worry about tomatoes.

It blows coming back from a vacation, and it blows even more when what you’re coming back to is New York.  (Sorry, people who heart New York.)  But, I’m back to life and back to work, and back to posting at 6:00 a.m.  Speaking of…

On becoming a morning person:

At a get-together at a friend’s house that evening, I wandered around in a sleepy, self-conscious haze. I went home at about 10 and picked up a novel to read in bed. A half-hour later, the book was slipping from my lifeless hands. So this is what being a morning person is like, I thought. It’s like being 80 years old.

So true.  It took me years to realize and accept that I’m a morning person.  It’s so square.  But I love mornings.  My favorite thing all day is the time spent drinking coffee, eating breakfast and reading the news.  The day tanks after that.  At about noon, I completely crash, and the rest of the day is nothing but a long, awful, exhausting trudge toward my distant bed.

Apparently, Gallagher is still touring:

I suddenly felt sad for Gallagher. At 61 years old, the man knows that the best way for him to make money is to milk his waning nostalgic value. If I was making my money doing the same thing that I’ve done most nights for the last 25 years, I’d probably be angry at my audience, too.

The first time I ever heard of Gallagher was when the girl who’d tormented me all through sixth grade, until we bonded at summer day camp over making fun of my best friend’s stubbly legs (ah, junior high), invited me to spend the night at her house.  We watched Gallagher on TV, before falling asleep on a mattress on the floor, only to wake up again four hours later because my new friend had peed the bed.

She never teased me again.

Much like preteen girls, Japan thinks it’s fat:

When his turn came, Mr. Nogiri, the flower shop owner, entered a booth where he bared his midriff, exposing a flat stomach with barely discernible love handles. A nurse wrapped a tape measure around his waist across his belly button: 33.6 inches, or 0.1 inch over the limit.

“Strikeout,” he said, defeat spreading across his face.

I have never been to Japan, but from everything I’ve heard about it, I think I’d freaking love it there.  It seems to be a nation of silent, quick-walking, hard-working, skinny perfectionists, who have all agreed on a strict code of public etiquette and abide by it without fail.  If it only had a tropical climate, I’d be packing my bags.

The first chancellor of American University of Iraq, Owen Cargol, has resigned from his post because of, well, this:

In a subsequent e-mail to the employee, Cargol described himself as “a rub-your-belly, grab-your-balls, give-you-a-hug, slap-your-back, pull-your-dick, squeeze-your-hand, cheek-your-face, and pat-your-thigh kind of guy.”

(via TPM)

Aren’t we all, deep down?

Why is Amtrak mostly just in the Northeast?

Several interrelated causes. The primary underlying issue is that in places where Amtrak depends on using rail lines that are owned by freight rail companies, it’s difficult / impossible to provide frequent, reliable service. Also, clearly, in a place where the right-of-way is owned by a freight company, you’re not going to build track optimized to the needs of high-speed passenger rail. . . Giving passenger rail more priority over freight rail would be a good idea since timeliness is more important to passengers than it is to giant boxes. But ultimately if we want to move more stuff by rail, we need to build more — and more modern — track.

Twenty-one countries prefer Obama to McCain.  Dissenting:  Jordan and the U.S.

June 5, 2008

It’s Called Sarcasm, Stupid

Guests at The Guardian Hay festival ask one question (whatever they most want to ask) to whoever they most want to interview:

Andre Vincent, comedian asks Marcus Brigstocke, comedian

Q You’ve got a fantastic life that I envy. Why do you get depressed so much?

A What an awful question, you horrid man. Well, I made a rule that if I don’t care about something, I won’t write about it. So I have involved myself in loads and loads of things that I passionately care about in the news and after a while, as they’ve accumulated, I have lost faith in the world being a benevolent place. . . . But I would be a mug not to realise that the life that I have is actually enviable, and enjoyable for the most part.

And:

Stephanie Merritt, author and journalist asks Omid Djalili, comedian and actor

Q Should comedy change the way people think about the world, or is it just pure entertainment?

A People can be entertained by comedy of the most puerile nature. People with great motives can also be capable of the most cringingly earnest experiences cloaked as entertainment. When motive and entertainment fuse you get the best combination.

(via Kottke)

(There are also many questions about things political.)

P.J. O’Rourke visits the Field Museum:

A very wordy inscription details the theories of when and how humans arrived in the New World. Translated from the academese: “We dunno.” An encomium to the Ice Age hunter-gatherers follows. “People like us,” it concludes, “prospered in ancient times.” We did indeed–if your idea of prosperity is fastening a “Clovis people” spearpoint to a stick and stabbing long-horned bison, giant grand sloths, wooly mammoths, mastodons, and New World horses until they were all extinct. The economic boom didn’t extend to casual wear and sports clothes. Ice Age or no, everyone in the talentlessly painted murals is naked. Nipples seem to have been vague and smudgy in ancient times, and a mastodon or giant ground sloth was always getting in between mural viewers and your genitals.

(via A&LD)

Whoa.  Burger King + advertising + Amsterdam = hugely inappropriate (yes, there is a photo):

The trayliner depicts the airport-style high security Burger King uses to ensure that only the top ingredients are used. Images include a scared Onion with his trousers down around his ankles while a fierce-looking Pickle guard with a latex glove, prepares to digitally examine him! Scattered about him from his open luggage are veggie porn mags!

Maybe this explains a problem I’ve been having:

What you may not have realized is that perceiving sarcasm, the smirking put-down that buries its barb by stating the opposite, requires a nifty mental trick that lies at the heart of social relations: figuring out what others are thinking. Those who lose the ability, whether through a head injury or the frontotemporal dementias afflicting the patients in Dr. Rankin’s study, just do not get it when someone says during a hurricane, “Nice weather we’re having.”

(via BB)

Ever since moving to NYC, I have had trouble with people interpreting my every comment as sincerely made.  I am sarcastic about 99% of the time, and, until I moved here, so was everybody else.  But for some reason (maybe it has more to do with the age bracket I’ve moved into), I now find myself constantly responding to “Really?!” with “No!  Of course not, I was being sarcastic!”  It’s so weird – you would think New Yorkers would be more sarcastic than everybody else, wouldn’t you?

Here’s an example of an actual conversation I had not too long ago:

Woman (off a star mag she was reading):  “Oh, Gwenyth Paltrow’s feeling harassed by paparazzi again.”

Me:  “Oh, that’s really awful.  I feel really terrible for celebrities.  They have to put up with so much.”

Woman (carefully):  “Yes.  But, you know, they choose that life, and they do really well for themselves, so I don’t always think it’s so bad.”

Me (blinking):  “Me neither.  I don’t feel sorry for celebrities at all.”

Woman:  “What?”

Me:  “I was…being entirely sarcastic.”

Woman:  “Oh.  Oh, I see.”

Me:  “I’m going to back slowly away from you now.”

This might sound like an extreme example, but I swear, this has been happening to me all the time.

Finally, Todd Levin tells a hilarious subway tale.

June 4, 2008

We Have a Nominee!!!

Great article about Jackson Katz, who educates men about “gender issues” that, he argues, should not be considered as such:

“As a culture, Americans first must take the step in acknowledging that violence against women is not a women’s issue, but a men’s issue,” Katz said.

. . . Katz points out a pattern that has evolved regarding how the media uses passive voice and sentences when reporting gender violence. Using a board in the front of the room, Katz helped make his point by providing the audience with a concrete exercise to illustrate the power of passive voice (see below).

John beat Mary. (active)

Mary was beaten by John. (passive)

Mary was beaten. (passive)

Mary was battered. (passive)

Mary is a battered woman. (active)

“John has left the conversation long ago, while Mary evolves into the active victim,” Katz said. “This evolution of victim-blaming is very pervasive in our society, because this is how our whole power structure is set up. We start asking why Mary put herself into a position to be beaten by John.” “If we really want to work on prevention, we need to start asking questions about John, not Mary,” Katz said. “We won’t get anything done until we start treating these issues as men’s issues and shift the paradigm at the cultural level.”

(via Feministing)

On the other hand, sometimes blaming the victim is hilarious and satisfying (a NYC man was acquitted for physically confronting a grunter in his Equinox spinning class):

“I don’t know if there’s going to be an uprising, but the short-term message is sometimes you can get away with assaulting somebody who’s annoying,” he said.

Indeed, some of the annoyed sat on the jury.

(via tmn)

How to win the New Yorker’s caption contest:

You are not trying to submit the funniest caption; you are trying to win The New Yorker’s caption contest.

Funny side note – not long ago, I actually met a New Yorker cartoonist (friend of a friend, who came to one of our improv shows), and what were the first words out of my mouth upon discovering his occupation?

“No kidding! I enter that caption contest every week!”

As soon as I said it, I realized: boy howdy, I bet actual cartoonists freaking hate that contest. And sure enough: “Well, that’s great,” he said. “I mean, I freaking hate that contest, but good luck to you.” (He didn’t say it in a jerky way.)

I really should have known better, because one of my pet peeves is that, when what you primarily do in life (or what you aspire to do) is creative, people who find it out will rush to explain to you how they actually do that thing, too. If you’re an actor, everybody who ever asks you what you do will be anxious to explain to you how they’re really an actor, too. If you’re a writer, you’ll be forever hearing about how your partner in conversation is really a writer, too. And I imagine that interior designers and chefs are constantly hearing about how everybody they meet is just brilliant at rearranging the furniture and cooking.

Now granted, most CPAs who declare, upon meeting an aspiring actor, that they used to act themselves in college are really every bit as much actors as whatever perpetually-not-cast “actor” they’re talking to, but my fascination with this conversational faux pas has more to do with why the CPA thinks the “actor” they’re talking to will somehow be gratified to hear that the CPA can do everything the “actor” they’ve just met can do and more, but has moved beyond it now and makes money instead. THIS IS NOT POLITE, PEOPLE!

Also, everyone’s fat and stupid.

June 3, 2008

Humanities Majors Strike!!

Humanities majors have gone on a citywide strike in New York City.

“There’s no need to bother anymore,” says Anna Diggs, a 27-year-old former marketing employee. “My rent has gone up every year, but I’ve never gotten a raise. And I just got a big tax refund since I made less than $18,000 last year, and I realized it was actually enough to cover my expenses for a couple months. So, I quit.”

While the humanities majors hold many different positions over a wide spectrum of industries, the actual job descriptions for all of them are strikingly similar.

“I basically surf the Internet and occasionally answer the phone,” says Marie Johnson, administrative assistant at a financial firm. “My two roommates both have nearly identical positions at other firms. I make $14/hour, Trish makes $18/hour and Erin makes $25/hour. We were all three placed through the same temp agency that’s been making $35/hour off each of us for the past year-and-a-half. Which is about how long it’s been since I went to a dentist.”

In the wake of the striking humanities majors, HR managers and temp agencies have been deluged with resumes from retail, restaurant, hotel and other minimum-wage workers.

“Frankly, I’ll do anything,” says Becca Horstead, a 48-year-old single mother of two, who currently works at a Borders. “They can pay me whatever they want, just so long as it’s over $7.15 an hour, and they let me sit my ass in a chair.”

These resumes, however, have been not been greeted with enthusiasm.

“I don’t know,” said Myra Beckinridge, HR-manager at Wees & Luxembaum LLC. “Since Katy [the file clerk for the heath care law division] left, Beatrice from word processing has been doing her work. And she’s applied for the position, but she’s…well, I don’t…”

Beckinridge paused for a moment before continuing.

“What I mean to say is, this position just demands too much responsibility for someone without a college degree.”

Asked for comment, Beatrice Jones replied, “I have a B.A. from CUNY! Did she even glance at my damn resume?”

Many employers are doubting whether they’ll replace the humanities majors at all.

“I’m thinking it’s really not that big a workload,” says Dennis Masterson at Techmode, a strategizing and data management firm. “What I might do is, just turn that paid position into several, part-time unpaid internships. We could get a couple smart, young college kids to come in a couple times a week and do this for college credit or something.”

Unpaid internships are nothing new to jobhunter, Matthew Bender, a 28-year-old former assistant copywriter.

“I’d been working at this trade publication for two years, through a temp agency,” Bender explains. “And I had my performance review, and my boss said he was really happy with me. I asked for benefits and a raise, and he said that I was a temp, and they couldn’t afford to hire me on right now. So, I quit and started looking for other editing or copywriting jobs – all the ones I found were fulltime jobs, but the publications had them listed as unpaid internships. What freaking idiots are doing all this work for free?”

When asked about his plans, Bender is noncommittal.

“I mean, being unemployed is nice, and not really that different,” Bender says. “I still sit at my computer all day for no money, only now I can wear jeans, and I don’t spend $10 on lunch.”

“In this economy,” says Techmode’s Masterson. “We really can’t afford to pay our employees.”

May 30, 2008

The Warm Weather Has Brought Them All Out

Two yards over from us, right outside my window, there’s a family with 24 children. Now that the weather’s nice, the children are let out of the house at about 9:00 a.m. and they remain outside until midnight…or even later. Now, I’m pretty outspoken about the fact that I don’t much care for children, but even if you think the little darlings are presh, you would probably agree with me that these particular children blow. I mean, they are just the worst freaking children ever. Imagine 24 little banshees setting up an inarticulate, piercing scream, and then maintaining that scream for fifteen hours a day, seven days a week, and you will begin to have some idea of the constant soundtrack that has accompanied my waking and would-be sleeping hours for the past several weeks.

And on top of that, the guys who live next door (in between us and the children) have also ventured out into their back yard. Which is fine. Except that they (and their friends) are of that breed of partiers who think the only way to enjoy socializing is to get drunk and scream. Back when I had a social life, I was in the ‘get drunk and lay around’ or ‘get drunk and vehemently discuss politics’ or ‘get drunk and laugh hysterically at everything everybody says’ social circles, and I have never understood the ‘get drunk and scream’ set. I mean, what are they even doing? What are they talking about? You know who I mean, right? Those who go “wooooooooooooooooooo!” over and over? What is that? If any wooers are reading this, seriously, explain to me why this happens, and why it is fun, and how it is even remotely tolerable for the people you are with. Why do woooooers have friends at all? They’re always surrounded by crowds. To me, the whole point of getting drunk in a backyard is to let it all go, to relax, to chill, to stare at each other and laugh at nothing, and let the wind blow through the chimes. I usually feel like screaming “wooooooooooooooooooooooo” when I’m at my most sober and parachuting from a plane. Not at 3 a.m., when I’ve had enough alcohol to knock out a horse.

Memorial Day eve, the guys next door at about 10 or so got out a guitar, and started screaming the lyrics to some songs. You’d expect drunk people to have a relatively short attention span for this kind of thing, right? No. They did the entire songs, and they kept it up, in unison and just screaming, for a full hour. And of course, since the kids were still outdoors, they started trying to scream over the drunk guys, and the drunk guys wouldn’t be upstaged by a bunch of children. Escalate, escalate. And the women attending the dude party crowed with forced laughter, trying to convince themselves they were included.

This is a bit of a tangent, but frankly, I just don’t comprehend the general jubilance that most people seem to be brimming over with at all times. It seems to take so little to make other people happy. One more damn, stupid Friday night with the same people drinking the same beer and talking about the same nonsense, and people go “woooooooo!!!!!” for sheer joy. I’ve never gotten that much joy out of a mere party, even if it was one of the (few) parties that actually turned out to be really fun. A party can be pleasant or it can be dull, but it’s rarely a portal to ecstasy (unless you’re on it). But most people are positively stoked all the time about nothing. These are the people who are so thrilled to be drinking and going “wooooooooooooo” that they will keep it up until the sun rises, and do it all over again the very next night. Even in my most hard-partying period, I either had to stir up some interesting shit (read: make out with somebody), or I was pretty much over it by 2:00.  The only times in my actual life that I’ve felt such joy I could have screamed “woooooooo” for hours were the times when someone had just given me an award.

Which explains a lot about me, and now that I write that, I guess it’s not that it takes so little to make other people happy, but rather, that it takes so much to make me happy. Perhaps I should examine that.

(On even more of a tangent, I have a theory that this is how potheads get started: they’re formerly active people who one day realized that if they just deadened enough brain cells, they’d actually become able to tolerate the crushing boredom of sitting around living rooms with their friends, watching a movie that everyone has already seen three times. Woooooooooooooo!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!)

Anyway, back to the subject at hand, I don’t actually mind the next-door guys as much as the children, because the guys next door so far (knock on wood) have gotten quiet once it hits 11:30 or so (also, a couple of them are attractive). But the kids are out there screaming all hours. Children are officially more obnoxious than drunk twenty-something hipsters.

Speaking of children ruining things for everybody else, I believe I’ve mentioned before that I find the increasingly crowded running track to be another drawback of summer. I usually run about 11:00 a.m. on weekdays, and it’s a pretty good time to go. Yesterday, however, there was a nursery school on the track. Some childcare workers had taken a whole gaggle of kindergarten-aged children onto the track, where of course, the kids were all over. I was running past, and a little girl waddled right into my path; I swerved to avoid her, and she somehow managed to leap over a whole lane and get in my way again, at which point, I pretty much knocked her over. “Hey! Hey!” I barked, trying to warn her, but she was in her own world. The childcare worker, to her credit, yelled at the little girl instead of me – what I don’t understand is, this track is right in between a giant, grassy park, and a big playground. Given those other, clearly more appropriate and desirable options, why the hell would they bring the kids onto the crowded running track?

The city’s got me feeling so hassled this week that I’m even feeling crowded in my own bedroom, what with all the backyard hoopla. I feel overrun – wherever I am standing, someone will undoubtedly suddenly need to be standing right there. If I find a deserted area, five minutes after I get there, four people will come sit on my damn lap. Hey, New York: why don’t you all let me know wherever it is that you’re not going to need to be, and I will go there?

And yes, I realize that the answer to this question is “anywhere else on the planet other than NYC.” Sigh.

May 28, 2008

Some Outrages, and Some That Aren’t, Really

Apparently, Rachael Ray wore a Palestinian scarf in a Dunkin’ Donuts ad, and right-wingers were so upset that DD had to pull the ad. As all of my regular readers know, a number of ads outrage me, but they’re all still on the air. If only the boys at Little Green Footballs would turn their considerable influence to rooting out misogyny in advertising…

If there’s one country that could turn shit into gasoline, it is so Sweden:

Cars using biogas created a stir when they began to be rolled out on a large scale at the start of the decade. The tailpipe emissions are virtually odorless, the fuel is cheaper than gasoline and diesel, and the idea of recovering energy from toilet waste appealed to green-minded Swedes.

(via The Morning News)

(It’s not all that successful, however.)

Turns out John McCain’s policy for dealing with the mortgage crisis was courtesy of a lobbyist for UBS bank:

MSNBC reports that McCain’s economic guru, Phil Gramm, advised the campaign while he was a paid lobbyist for the Swiss bank UBS. In other words, Gramm was advising McCain on what to do about the mortgage crisis while he getting paid push the legislative agenda of one of the major architects of the mortgage crisis.

More details here:

As MSNBC reported, UBS deregistered Gramm as a lobbyist for the company on April 18th, though he continues to serve as a vice chairman of the bank. But that was fully a month after McCain’s speech outlining his own approach to the crisis.

The Dalai Lama would like to attend the Olympics:

China reacted coolly on Thursday to a suggestion from the Dalai Lama that he would be happy to attend the Beijing Olympics, and suggested talks with Tibet’s exiled spiritual leader’s envoys may be delayed by the Sichuan earthquake.

(via FP Passport)

Also, here’s a cool picture of Gloucestershire’s annual cheese-rolling (one man appears to be in a pig suit).

Don’t miss this Slate article about who’s actually responsible for disciplining UN peacekeepers when they go on child rape-a-thons in the countries they’re supposed to be helping:

Though the United Nations has a zero-tolerance policy when it comes to sexual exploitation and abuse, the most severe action it can take is repatriation of the accused-at the contributing nation’s expense-and, if the accused is eventually found guilty, a block on future service in U.N. missions.

Several articles lately professing shock at how little some people trying to live on a shoestring budget spend and eat have left me wondering: am I out of touch, or is everybody else? Because I spend so much less and eat so much less than the people in the “shocking” examples given in these articles…I mean, good lord:

Mr. Driscoll has since started packing two peanut-butter-and-jelly sandwiches for lunch. Dinner might be two baked potatoes. On a recent Monday, it was franks and beans. On a good night, he might spend up to $6.

If people really consider this an absolutely shocking sign of deprivation, I must be doing far, far worse than I ever thought. And as much as I joke, I actually think I’m doing pretty well.  (Oh, I should clarify that the articles I’m talking about, including the one linked above, are the articles about young starving-artist types, not the articles about actual poor people.)

May 26, 2008

I’ve Been Exploring: McCarren Park Kite Festival

Last summer, I saw nothing of New York. This summer I’m trying to go on at least a brief walkabout every nice weekend. I bring my camera with me and make strangers uncomfortable by pointing it around with the flash off. When I was backpacking, all I did was wander around and look at things and take photos. I should really explore New York City the same as I did Phnom Penh, or Luang Prabang. Because who knows how long I’ll be here.

The weekend before last, I took some pictures just around my neighborhood here, Greenpoint. I live near McCarren Park, which is a shitty little park, really, but in the summer it (like all parks) becomes a festival of happiness, as everybody sacks out on the grass to soak up sun while they can, and wonder why they don’t just move to a nicer city. (Do I sound a little down on NYC lately?)

Greenpoint is the second largest Polish community in the States (after Chicago), and a lot of the signage and stuff around here is in Polish, which is sometimes fun. For example, this sign is on my block…

Wedel to urok, wedel to smak!

Wedel to urok, wedel to smak!

I don’t know what Wedel to urok, wedel to smak! means, and I don’t want to, because what I’ve decided it means is much more fun.

Every weekend in McCarren Park, there is a farmer’s market:

A farmer's market.

A farmer’s market.

Where you can buy honey, among other things:

Many honey.

Many honey.

Younger people lie on the grass, and look chill and fashionable:

Crowded park.

You know you want to lie with us.

And older people sit on the benches, and look pissed and disapproving:

We are older than other people here.

We think you should sit up and put more clothes on.

Some people are very happy to be in the park:

We are so happy!

We are so happy!

While other people think the park’s happy to see them:

coolsmaller

We are so cool.

The park can be peaceful:

Less crowded park.

Or there might be a parade:

Don't react to the parade.

Let’s not react to the parade.

This particular day, there was a kite festival:

Kites!

Kites! And families!

There were many kites:

Another shot of kites. And some dude.

Kites! And some dude!

And clowns performing:

Clowns!

The clowns were not as funny as this little girl is making them seem:

A hilarious show.

You SLAY me!

And of course, there are children in the park:

Horrid little children.

Horrid little children. See? Even their moms look sick of them.

Look at them, trying to be all wide-eyed and endearing. Posers.

Well, that’s all for the park, but I did want to mention that later that night, as I was waiting for the L to come home, I saw this couple indulging in shameless subway PDA:

Subways are romantic!

The romance of the subway!

As you can see, most people ignored them, but I was disgusted, as was this random guy standing behind me:

Gross!

Gross!

…Hey…wait a second. Isn’t that…the same guy?!?!

But how…? But what…?

My mind is officially blown.

May 22, 2008

Culture, Culture, Culture

So, Iceland (my knowledge about which begins and ends with Bjork) is tops on the UNDP’s Human Development Index ranking. Which is pretty cool, except you would have to live in Iceland (this is also the problem with Sweden…suicide, anyone?). But hey, check out this awesomeness: nine months of paid maternity leave to be split between the mom and dad as they choose. YES! Standing O, Iceland!! (Although, granted, it might not be the most workable thing to give Americans nine paid months off every time they successfully knock each other up.)

Another great deal along these lines: Zappos offers its new employees $1,000 to quit on their first day!

According to James Frey, he never reads what he writes. Explains a lot. Hey, speaking of fad books, can someone tell me why everybody in NYC is currently reading Middlesex? Is this just an amazing example of the collective groupmind at work, or did some cultural icon recently recommend it on a talk show? (Not that anyone listens to me, but if you’re currently working on it, I would suggest you spare yourself and put it down now – especially if it’s the only book you’ll be reading this year.)

Speaking of doing just as others do, let’s all talk about SITC: here, an impressionable young girl first becomes a ho like Samantha, and then a Mormon like her (the girl’s) husband. Hey, whatever’s in front of you…

Related, are civilization and culture in opposition to each other?

The problem is that civilisation needs culture even if it feels superior to it. Its own political authority will not operate unless it can bed itself down in a specific way of life. Men and women do not easily submit to a power that does not weave itself into the texture of their daily existence – one reason why culture remains so politically vital. Civilisation cannot get on with culture, and it cannot get on without it.

(via 3 Quarks Daily)

Eric Alterman responds to Brink Lindsey’s commentary (which I quoted yesterday):

I feel that libertarianism, as I understand it, is overly concerned with theoretical liberty at the expense of its actual practice. The freedom to starve, to see one’s labor unfairly exploited, to drink polluted water or breath polluted air, are not freedoms I strongly value. And to battle these and others like them, society requires collective institutional action and in many cases, government (or labor union) protection. I’m no fan of “big government” per se–and neither was Dewey. It’s merely that powerful forces like global corporations require powerful forces to balance them.

Lately, everyone seems to be saying that, while Clinton’s candidacy may have revealed a huge undercurrent of misogyny in our society, it did not actually suffer from this misogyny. That’s as it may be; however, speaking for myself at least, that revealed misogyny is exactly what has surprised and upset me throughout the primaries. I’m very disappointed by all of the openly hostile and condescendingly dismissive talk about Clinton’s campaign, both by men in the media and by guys I know in my own, personal life. I can say the same thing for racism laid bare by Obama’s campaign. Before this primary season, I naively thought that people (in my set, at any rate) had overcome at least the more overt racist and sexist thinking. Turns out, everyone has continued holding all the same racist and sexist opinions all this time – they’ve just learned to mostly keep their mouths shut about it.

Also, according to one of McCain’s advisers, calling Clinton a bitch isn’t misogynist, because, you see, Clinton really is a bitch.

Negotiating this week:  Israel and Syria, Lebanon and Hezbollah…and Pakistan and the Taliban:

Pakistan will pull its troops out of the Swat valley in its Northwest Frontier Province according to an agreement signed today by government negotiators and local Taliban leaders. Local authorities also agreed to enforce Sharia law so long as girls are allowed to attend school and militants do not carry weapons in public.

Finally, last night I saw Eric Bogosian do a benefit reading for Labyrinth Theater Company of some of his less frequently performed monologues. Eric Bogosian is one of my theatre heroes (I love all monologists, since my dream career involves me talking endlessly to myself, while crowds of people I never have to interact with face-to-face applaud thunderously somewhere out beyond the blaring lights), but I’ve never seen him perform – I’ve just watched whatever DVDs of his solo shows are available, and I’ve read all his stuff. In fact, just recently, I was randomly reading The Essential Bogosian, which includes several of the pieces he performed last night. This is one reason why living in NYC is actually cool – you can actually go see the people you like do the things you like (if you can rip yourself away from your laptop long enough).

May 8, 2008

Momofukin Meal: The Foodie Final Rounds

At the height of my career as a pro eater, I secured a resy to the illustrious Momofuku Ko. I was honored to be chosen. I hoped I was up to the challenge.

On the night in question, my dining companion and I nervously dressed, showered, and took a cab to the East Village. The restaurant, marked by an apricot on a frosted glass pane, is unassuming in atmosphere. We squared up to the bar, and straddled our backless stools.

Prior to the meal, David Chang led all of the diners in a rousing hymn of praise and thanks that we could all be a part of this dinner tonight. For most of us diners, being permitted to pay for this meal was the achievement of a lifetime, something we’d been dreaming about ever since we first heard that food could be elevated into a lifestyle. Our stomachs had been prepped for this by endlessly dissected dining experiences in multiple countries. We’d studied food, we’d immersed ourselves in wine. We’d poured money into our educated gullets, and we had yet more to spend. We knew our stuff, and we knew it well. We were advanced eaters, the top of the ranks.

We were ready to eat this food.

The meal began with a single fried porkrind on a piece of slate. My stomach jibbered and bounced in bliss. Everyone clapped. Kate Bosworth, who’d been admitted not because she was an advanced eater (quite the opposite), but because she was a celebrity, realized right away she wasn’t anywhere near advanced enough to be eating at Ko, and withdrew from the meal in shame.

Ten diners remained.

Chang served the second course. English muffins smeared with rendered pork fat. I began to be nervous. Would I be able to eat this course successfully? I felt the pressure of making it all the way to the finals. Granted, I’m no novice when it comes to dining, but if you blow it at Ko, you’ll never be taken seriously as an eater again. And I’ve always taken pride in my ability to ingest. Would this evening be the end of all my dreams?

But then, oh joy! I was able to appreciate the English muffins. I had made it through another course.

Next, fluke sashimi. I swallowed it down with nary a hitch. I was dimly aware of some commotion by the door – later, my dining companion told me that some people who’d failed to orgasm over the English muffins (thus revealing themselves as food amateurs) were bounced from the restaurant altogether – but at the time, I was so in the zone, I’d ceased to be aware of my surroundings.

Eight diners remaining: kimchi consumme over an oyster. I began to entertain another fear altogether: what if I went all the way tonight at Ko? If I successfully ate this dinner, I would reach the top of the top bracket of diners. Where would I go from there? What does one do after reaching the top? Eat at Per Se again? I began to feel oddly depressed.

Coddled egg with caviar. I am knocking each course out of the park. I hope my dining companion is keeping up – I’m vaguely aware of his presence, but I can’t worry about him. I have to focus on my own performance. The big one is coming up: the course in which some diners are given the spare ribs, and others, the shitty chicken. David Chang is walking up and down the bar, looking over our shoulders, studying our jaw muscles as we chew and making notes on a clipboard. Am I eating in good form? Am I murmuring appreciation in the right degree at the right times? Am I vocal enough to show surprise at the excellence of the food, but not so much that it seems I’m unacquainted with taste arrangements at this level? I have to get those spare ribs – I’ve trained my whole life for those spare ribs. I’m good enough, and I deserve them!

If David Chang gives me the chicken, I’ll kill myself.

Scallop with clams. I’m in another place entirely. I’m eating without even thinking now, just like I was born to do it.

Shaved foie gras torchon with Riesling jelly, lychee and pinenuts. Oh, God. I wasn’t expecting this. I’m not very experienced with jellied dishes. Oh, no. This is a disaster. I have to appreciate this appropriately! I must get those ribs! I put a bite in my mouth, just as Chang stops behind me. He can sense this is my weak spot. All eyes are on me. I feel Chang’s breath on my ear.

I like it!! I LIKE IT!!!!! Oh, thank God! Waves of relief crash over me and I break into hysterical, relieved laughter, as the other diners applaud, and David Chang, the master, sets a plate of spare ribs before me.

‘Congratulations,’ he says. And he applauds.

And I? I do what I do: I eat.

For I, my friends, am an Eater.

May 7, 2008

Some Interesting Things

Here’s a comprehensive answer to a question I asked many a post ago: what happens if you routinely screw up your recycling?

When loads of plastic are dumped on a recycling facility’s floor, the sorting fun begins. Workers often start by picking through the piles in search of obviously discordant items-kiddie play sets, lawn furniture, clothing mannequins. They also scan for plastic mounds that are drenched in nonrecyclable trash, such as food slurries or medical waste.

Taylor Clark attempts to dispel the myth of the obnoxiously condescending vegetarian by penning an obnoxiously condescending article:

Those of us who want to avoid the social nightmare have to hide our vegetarianism like an Oxycontin addiction, because admit it, omnivores: You know nothing about us. Do we eat fish? Will we panic if confronted with a hamburger? Are we dying of malnutrition? You have no clue.

In all seriousness, I think vegetarianism is admirable (although PETA, which runs ads that objectify women in order to promote its agenda of giving humanity to animals, can suck it). But I’ve never understood my vegetarian friends’ complaints of the difficulty of finding anything to eat. I’m not even remotely a vegetarian, and I’d estimate that 90% of my diet is cheese, bread and sugar.

I am nothing if not a lover of routine – in fact, my behavior is so habitual that it borders on insane. Like many writers, I find that I am unable to be creative at all if I don’t build being creative into a fairly rigid routine. According to this article, the important thing is to change up your habits:

. . . it seems antithetical to talk about habits in the same context as creativity and innovation. But brain researchers have discovered that when we consciously develop new habits, we create parallel synaptic paths, and even entirely new brain cells, that can jump our trains of thought onto new, innovative tracks.

Not long ago, I leafed through a book (can’t remember the title) that was basically a longer version of the above article. The book’s author advised that, to free up creative thinking and combat brain atrophy (and possibly Alzheimer’s), you should constantly be trying to surprise your own brain by doing something jolting – walking a different way to work, writing with the wrong hand, using the opposite hand to do different tasks, performing daily activities in a different order than usual, and so forth. Hmm. Maybe I should build breaking my routine into my routine.

Lindsay Beyerstein responds to Thomas Friedman on subprime mortgages:

Earlier generations weren’t more virtuous because they had less debt. Their dollars bought more. They were more likely to have steady jobs with benefits, including employer-subsidized incentives to save . . . Americans have always valued hard work–and nothing has changed. In the USA, the average worker clocks more hours than anywhere else in the industrialized world.

A very brief history of illegal immigration:

Chinese exclusion invented something like the concept and business of modern illegal immigration.

(Related, sometimes a picture is worth a thousand misspelled words.)

And finally, this is way cooler than missed connections: if you live in New York, this guy might draw you…especially if you hang out much at the Taco Bell on 14th.  (via Kottke)

May 6, 2008

Brooklyn Rent Crisis: 48-Hours In the Life

(Prelude: On Tuesday, an envelope arrives under the door of apartment 1, heralding a rent increase of $300 and a year-lease to begin June 1st, and generously permitting four days for decision-making purposes.)

Saturday:

7:30 am: Roommate 1 awakes.

9:00 am: Roommate 2 awakes. Rs 1 and 2 discuss the situation.

10:30 am: Roommate 3 awakes, takes last of coffee, goes back into room and shuts door.

10:35 am: Rs 1 and 2 knock on R3′s door and request that R3 join them in discussing the crisis.

10:36-11:30 am: Wailing and gnashing of teeth.

11:30 am: Decision reached to negotiate with landlord, ask for three month extension at current rent, or at least before having to commit to lease.

11:35 am -12:35 pm: R1 showers, dresses and makes and consumes fry-up breakfast. Rs 2 and 3 watch.

12:36 pm: R2 asks R1 if we’re about ready to make a move on this. R1 consents. Landlord is phoned, says he’s coming right over.

1:48 pm: Landlord arrives, is seated, negotiations begin. Rs 1 and 3 stare pleasantly at the ceiling, and R2 is consequently forced to do all the talking.

1:49 pm: Delay on rent increase flatly denied.

1:50 – 2:10 pm: Delay on lease mulled over favorably. Inquiry posed as to what happens if no extension granted. Will Rs 1, 2 and 3 be out by June 1st?

2:11 pm: Somebody says ‘eviction proceedings.’ Much screaming. Landlord exits.

2:12 pm: Awkward pause, followed by nervous laughter.

2:30 pm: Landlord phones. There will be no compromise.

2:31 pm – 4:45 pm: Laptops circled. Craigslist is alternately praised and condemned. R1 emails possible listings to R3, who leaves many voicemails. R2 researches tenants’ rights, and consults with friend who is a landlord.

4:45 pm: R3 excuses self, goes in room, calls Mom, cries. She hates New York, wants to move somewhere pretty and warm, by the beach possibly, or to Paris.

5:00 pm: R1 and friend watch Kentucky Derby. A filly breaks its ankles and is euthanized on the spot. R3 goes for long, aggressive run – she will miss the adjacent park. R2 lies on bed and stares at ceiling – she is SO over this bullshit.

6:00 – 9:00 pm: On advice of R1′s friend, rentdirect joined and paid for. More laptop work, and phone calls. R3 buys and consumes large slice of chocolate cake. R1 asks for bite, and is grudgingly given a small piece.

9:30 pm: Rs too depressed to go out, retire to rooms. R1 goes to bed. R3 drinks, tinkers with personal budget and account balance over and over. Surely, must be mistake somewhere?

11:45 pm: R3 falls asleep in chair.

Sunday

7:30 am: R1 awakes, showers, makes and eats eggs.

8:15 am: Rs 2 and 3 awake, dress in same clothes as yesterday.

9:00 am: Rs walk to L train. L train is on weekend service. Rs are swallowed by pressing mob.

9:30 am: Rs emerge at Union Square, walk to 6th to catch F to Park Slope. Rs are blocked by bike marathon. Rs wait impatiently. Bikers swarm past endlessly, hollering and cheering each other on.

9:35 am – 10:15 am: Rs ride F train to Park Slope. Wonder if they will be riding F train frequently in future.

10:15 am: Rs walk to open house through beautiful Park Slope area. Rs love Park Slope!! Rs are thrilled to pieces to live in Park Slope! Rs hate stupid current apartment anyway.

10:17 am: No one answers bell at open house, no sign or way into the apartment. Rs stand on sidewalk. R1 apologizes.

10:18 – 10:45 am: Rs make their way up to Bed-Stuy area, split up.

11:00 – 11:20 am: Rs 1 and 3 wait on stoop in war zone, next to construction site. R3 eats Clif bar. Building owner’s son appears, and shows small apartment with no closets, and back window overlooking small rubble-strewn lot and graffiti-covered wall. Car alarm begins to blare.

11:20 am – 12:00 pm: Rs 1 and 3 walk to nearby apartment. Realize front door is impassible due to construction, men on ladders with power tools. R3 phones landlord and cancels.

12:15 pm: Rs meet again. Rs do not love Bed-Stuy.

12:15 pm – 1:00 pm: Rs walk to next appointment for many miles, because R3, who planned the route, swears is quicker to just walk than deal with Sunday train service in Brooklyn. Rs 1 and 2 are very quiet for duration of walk.

1:15 pm: Next appointment reached. Shit hole. Landlord is called and appointment is canceled.

1:30 pm: R2 goes into city. Rs 1 and 3 walk home, because is easier to just walk than try to take freaking awful trains through Brooklyn. R3 mentions how nice current neighborhood is, what a good area for going on runs. The park. Young people. Good bakeries. R1 is ready to be alone for awhile.

2:00 pm – on: Rs go about their business. They can’t think about this any more today.

10:30 pm: Landlord visits apartment. R1 is home. Landlord agrees to 3-month hold on lease, provided Rs pay rent increase.

11:00 pm: Rs phone each other, and wearily accept landlord’s offer. Crisis delayed for three months. At which point, R3 figures she’ll surely have enough saved to move to Paris.

April 27, 2008

Interesting Stuff This Week

The Morning News’ always entertaining John Warner and Kevin Guilfoile discuss Obama’s bitter comment:

Bitterness is not why people in rural areas “cling to their guns.” Bitterness is why people in rural areas, just like everywhere else, cling to beer.

Patriotism is a hot topic lately, and if you are one of those people who don’t understand why anybody wouldn’t love America, Tyler Cowen at Marginal Revolution spells out eight of his reasons, before going on to say:

On the brighter side, America has a decent economic track record, the Solow model does matter (try living and earning in countries with poor Solow indicators), America remains the world’s leading innovator, and most Americans — at least those not in prison or on drugs — can expect a bright future. It’s not as if I’m pushing the future economic prospects of Suriname.

I think that for a lot of those patriots who fail to comprehend anti-American sentiment, the point quoted above is so important as to render nearly meaningless the eight points above it, and they think that anybody who doesn’t love America must not be sufficiently aware of its economic opportunities.

Which makes sense, since our brains apparently equate profit with praise:

“If the hierarchy is fixed forever, then it’s good to be the top monkey.”

Speaking of economic opportunities (and the lack thereof), Harry Brighouse at Crooked Timber discusses the deficit model of poverty:

The stresses that accompany poverty (for those who do not choose it, which is everyone except nuns, monks, and the odd saint) are often very demanding and sometimes overwhelming – they make it harder for people to make good long-term decisions and stick to them, sometimes because there just are no good long term options. So yes, if you like, I do think that poverty creates deficits. But then, I don’t see why we should complain about, or try to get rid of, it, unless it is because it creates deficits.

As to America’s Problem with Prisoners, we learned this week that one out of every 100 American adults is now in jail (there’s one huge chunk of the population who won’t be voting in the primaries):

“In no country is criminal justice administered with more mildness than in the United States,” Alexis de Tocqueville, who toured American penitentiaries in 1831, wrote in “Democracy in America.”

No more.

Also, note in the above article that San Marino has the lowest prison population – just one (I assume) guy. I would absolutely love to interview San Marino’s sole prisoner and see how (again, I assume) he feels about holding this distinction.

On Talking Points Memo Café, Daniel Levy has five things to say about Israel’s strike on the Syrian facility (and why we’re discussing it now), including this:

So here is a delicious and rare moment of Israeli-Syrian agreement: : we both want to talk, the nature of the Syria-Israel issue is that we both need US facilitation, the Bush Administration is not interested and so, we will have to wait.

Meanwhile, some woman let her nine-year-old take the subway home alone, hoping that everybody would talk about it, and everybody has obliged. I get her point that people hover over their children too much, but here’s the thing: she didn’t turn him lose in 99.99% of America. She turned him lose in the NYC subway. Which is the strangest, most congested, unhygienic, freak-filled hell portal in the entire U.S.A. I don’t even like to mosey in the subway. Honestly, I don’t know why people still insist on viewing Manhattan as a normal, residential area. I realize that it was one once upon a time, but nowadays, Manhattan is Disney World for CEOs and aspiring artists. It’s a weird, artificial, overcrowded, unreal place, and there’s no reason to try and navigate it daily, unless you have business here, or you’re trying to make it in some field where you need to be a stone’s throw from everybody else in that field. It’s sure as heck not a place to send your nine-year-old out stumbling around getting in everybody’s way. I don’t care if people’s nine-year-olds are supervised or not, as long as they’re in Yonkers where they belong.

Moving on to my favorite arena of outrage (women getting the shit-end), Slate’s Dahlia Lithwick discusses the recent Senate action regarding the Supreme Court’s Lilly Ledbetter verdict:

So, 42 members of the U.S. Senate blocked a bill that would allow victims of gender discrimination to learn of and prove discrimination in those rare cases in which their employers don’t cheerfully discuss it with them at the office Christmas party. And the reasons for blocking it include the fact that women are not smart enough to file timely lawsuits, not smart enough to avoid being manipulated by vile plaintiffs’ lawyers, not smart enough to know when they are being stiffed, and-per John McCain-not well-trained enough in the first place to merit equal pay.

So how dumb are we? Well, if we don’t vote some people who actually respect women into Congress soon, we just may be as dumb as those senators think.

Speaking of women continuing to stick their fingers in their ears and hum, the wide world of advertising continues on its merry, woman-bashing way. The latest: one of Tom Ford’s ads has been banned in Italy. Here’s the ad in question (I don’t really have much of an opinion about this ad in particular, but I do hate Tom Ford in general):

Tom Ford\'s dumb ad.

It’s hilarious to me that Italy – Italy – would ban anything for being offensive to women. That aside, upon first seeing this photo, I anticipated that men and women to the left and right would rush to gasp at how ridiculous it is that a photo devoid of explicit T&A could possibly offend anyone. Generally when porn-in-advertising debates arise, most commentators refuse to address symbolic, implied, or even overt misogyny in advertising, preferring instead to focus on how people are prudish about sex, as if plain old sex was the point, rather than violent and/or degrading sexual content aimed entirely at portraying women as submissive to all manner of victimization. And I was anticipating reading an argument along those lines when I clicked on a link to this blog post, but rather, I was treated to a barrage of Italian ads that make the Tom Ford one look positively romantic. Specifically, check out this Dolce & Gabbana ad:

Gang rapes are pretty.

Now, from time to time, I’ve decided to compile a list of all products and companies I refuse to buy from because their advertisements are misogynist. I’ve always had to go back on this resolution, because inevitably my list grew so long so fast that I was left unable to buy much anything but Dove products (and for all I know, the people who own Dove likely own other lines that run down women as well). This post just illustrates how difficult it is not to support the objectification of women with your hard-earned pennies: over here in the States, high fashion shits on women in tastefully hypocritical, closeted ways, but apparently in Italy, they have no such scruples and Dolce & Gabbana can go ahead and run a full-out airbrushed gang rape. It’s not like I buy designer labels, but I don’t always remember to NOT buy them with sufficient conviction. I should have to look at this ad every day for the rest of my life to remind myself to never, ever, even for a second even think about paying a freaking penny to the fashion industry. I mean, I actually really like Dolce & Gabbana’s dresses: had I gotten rich suddenly and had an event to attend, I could possibly have bought one without ever knowing they had glorified gang rape to sell fashion. It just goes to show you how hard it is not to pay people for actively insulting you, for celebrating actual violence against you as SEXXY. You must exercise constant, international vigilance.


Finally, Foreign Policy released its list of the top 100 public intellectuals this week, and bloggers on all the sites I habitually read have reacted in outrage at the anti-intellectualism of most of these intellectuals. They regret the omission of dozens of more apt choices I’ve never heard of. I can’t follow the debate over this. I do know who a lot of people on FP’s list are, but I don’t know enough about them (or the people they’ve edged out) to be outraged at their inclusion. And that, really, perfectly sums up my intellectual acumen: I am smart and informed enough to read people who know what’s up, but not smart or informed enough to know what’s up myself.

April 25, 2008

Spring Is Here: A Runner’s Lament

Summer is just around the corner. Normally at this time of year, my seasonal anger (which starts to build in late September and reaches its peak in the dead month of February) melts as the sun rises. This year is different, however, because this year is the first year I’ve managed to run outdoors throughout the entire winter. New York is mild enough; in Chicago, I could never make it much past mid-October. Anyway, because of this, for the first time the warming weather has actually had some negative effects in my life: there are people about now. When I go running in the park of a morning (or afternoon), there are people all over the paths. People meandering back and forth, people with dogs, people with babies, people with yoga mats and ice cream cones and no sense of purpose or direction. People, in short, who are In The Way.

They are even in the way on the running track, which blows my mind. While I may hate it, I understand how some people arrive at the conclusion that sidewalks are an appropriate place to list vaguely back and forth while staring at the sky with your thumb up your ass, but surely an actual running track is the one place in New York where even the most placid and directionless fool would realize people are meant to move about in an orderly, brisk, purposeful fashion. But yet, the track in Greenpoint is clogged with people (and their freaking children) wandering all over the place, completely oblivious to the lanes and the many runners moving with a momentum that makes it difficult to swerve and stop at a moment’s notice. There are people who appear as though this one half-hearted lollop around a track is the first time they’ve gotten off a couch since they hit puberty. There are old people who wheel around and stop in the lane and gawk at you when you run up behind them, as though they’re horribly offended you would do something so blatant and aggressive as run on a running track, when they are out for their morning waddle. There are even (I swear to God) hulking teenage boys riding little girls’ bikes the wrong way around the track. And incidentally, every single time I’ve observed any soccer player from the field in the middle of the track crossing after some errant ball, I’ve never once seen one of them look both ways and wait for runners to pass. Nope, they just stroll right on across without looking up and let the joggers either stop short, jerk to the sides or plow straight into them.

So much for the running track. There are also two parks where I run every day, and both of them have been lately ruined by the Brooklyn Park Service’s yearly spring maintenance. In Park No. 1, they are busily cutting the branches off all the trees; to avoid killing people with the falling limbs, they helpfully tape off the portion of the walk that they’ll be working on that day, except that they usually only remember to tape off one side of it, so that you’ll be running along and suddenly you’re clotheslined by a length of police tape appearing seemingly out of nowhere, just before a giant tree comes crashing down behind you. And the air is thick with sawdust. In Park No. 2, they have repaved the running track with an insanely thick, pillowy bed of uneven wood shavings, which is about as easy to run through as a Chuck E. Cheese ball pit.

I can’t wait till fall.

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 60 other followers