<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: I&#8217;ve Been Reading:  Of the Farm</title>
	<atom:link href="http://accismus.com/2009/07/26/ive-been-reading-of-the-farm/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://accismus.com/2009/07/26/ive-been-reading-of-the-farm/</link>
	<description>I don&#039;t crave the warmth of your unconditional approval.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 21 Apr 2012 22:29:35 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Elizabeth</title>
		<link>http://accismus.com/2009/07/26/ive-been-reading-of-the-farm/#comment-2076</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Elizabeth]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 14 Aug 2009 19:21:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://accismus.wordpress.com/?p=665#comment-2076</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Thanks for your suggestions.  I will check out Pigeon Feathers - so far, I&#039;ve only read Updike&#039;s more recently published New Yorker stories, which everyone agrees are not representative.  (And yes, eventually, I&#039;m sure I will read at least one of the Rabbit novels, but it might be awhile before I get around to them.)]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for your suggestions.  I will check out Pigeon Feathers &#8211; so far, I&#8217;ve only read Updike&#8217;s more recently published New Yorker stories, which everyone agrees are not representative.  (And yes, eventually, I&#8217;m sure I will read at least one of the Rabbit novels, but it might be awhile before I get around to them.)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ian Woolcott</title>
		<link>http://accismus.com/2009/07/26/ive-been-reading-of-the-farm/#comment-2075</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Ian Woolcott]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 14 Aug 2009 17:40:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://accismus.wordpress.com/?p=665#comment-2075</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[If you want to give Updike a fair shot read two of his more famous pieces.  &#039;Rabbit Run&#039; is a great work of American fiction - and one of the first things he did to put him in bad odor with feminists.  But it is absolutely worthwhile and a great pleasure to read.  Also, his short story &#039;Pigeon Feathers&#039; - only about twenty pages long but wonderful stuff.  Nothing objectionable there, I think, but it touches on some of Updike&#039;s main themes (religion, mortality) in an especially compelling way.  The butterfly passage you quote may well have been written tongue-in-cheek.  But Updike wrote so goddamn much that not all of it is by any means of the highest quality.  Updike said that English prose should only be written &quot;ecstatically&quot; - which means, yes, he&#039;s a bit florid sometimes, but in the tradition, I think, of the Great God Melville, to whom we all bow down and sing praises forever and ever Amen.  [smile]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If you want to give Updike a fair shot read two of his more famous pieces.  &#8216;Rabbit Run&#8217; is a great work of American fiction &#8211; and one of the first things he did to put him in bad odor with feminists.  But it is absolutely worthwhile and a great pleasure to read.  Also, his short story &#8216;Pigeon Feathers&#8217; &#8211; only about twenty pages long but wonderful stuff.  Nothing objectionable there, I think, but it touches on some of Updike&#8217;s main themes (religion, mortality) in an especially compelling way.  The butterfly passage you quote may well have been written tongue-in-cheek.  But Updike wrote so goddamn much that not all of it is by any means of the highest quality.  Updike said that English prose should only be written &#8220;ecstatically&#8221; &#8211; which means, yes, he&#8217;s a bit florid sometimes, but in the tradition, I think, of the Great God Melville, to whom we all bow down and sing praises forever and ever Amen.  [smile]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

